CANCELLED

Certificate of Destruction

No. 000001

The quantity below was irreversibly destroyed on Solana. This inscription records it on Zcash and cannot be reissued.

Quantity destroyed

1,500,000

STAMP

Delivered to

t1P2GcxGhzeM5tPk3r3JsGh1tEVArD4C2fB

Burn STAMP on Solana. Keep a certificate on Zcash stamped with exactly what you destroyed.

One way. No escrow, no custody, nobody holding your funds. The tokens stop existing; the certificate is the only thing left.

Real, on Zcash mainnet. Inscription b2cbded5c37c2cca8918a077a73e2ca349005efba046cee0866b34dd879c5acb

Burn yours

Issue a certificate

1Your Solana wallet

No Solana wallet detected in this browser. Install Phantom or Solflare, then reload.

2Where the certificate goes

3How much STAMP to destroy

Minimum 1,000,000. The certificate records this number exactly.

This cannot be undone, reversed or refunded. Your tokens stop existing the moment you sign.

Just launched

All coins

Every one of these was created here, and its collection registered on Zcash in the same signature. Holders burn at least 1,000,000 tokens for a certificate.

Every burn

1,000,000 tokens destroyed across 1 certificate

WhenCoinDestroyedBurnerCertificate to
5h agoSTAMP1,000,00026oK…GtYAt1P2GcxGhzeM5tPk3r3JsGh1tEVArD4C2fBtx

Read from Solana, judged by the same rule the bridge uses. A refused burn still destroyed its tokens — the rule only decides whether a certificate is owed, and it cannot give them back.

Why a stamp, and not a token

Zcash cannot hold assets yet

Shielded assets are specified — ZIP 226 and ZIP 227 — but they are drafts. They are not on mainnet, and the next network upgrade does not include the transaction format they need.

Zcash can hold inscriptions today

An inscription needs no new consensus rules. It is an ordinary transparent transaction carrying data, which Zcash has accepted since the beginning. Around 113,000 already exist on mainnet.

So the stamp is the asset, in the only form Zcash accepts today

Not a placeholder image. A record of one specific destruction, written to the chain the asset will eventually live on.

Uniqueness is doing real work

Each stamp maps to exactly one burn and can be claimed once. A balance cannot say that this destruction happened, on this date, for this amount, to this person. Only a unique record can.

When shielded assets activate, each stamp converts to the amount cut into it. The stamp is the claim that survives until then.

Check it yourself

A certificate counts only if it names a real burn that has not already been claimed, and is delivered to the address that burner chose. Anyone can rebuild the whole set from public data on both chains and get the same answer we do.

A certificate on Zcash mainnet

1,500,000 destroyed on Solana, recorded on Zcash, delivered to the address that burned it.

Inscription
b2cbded5c37c2cca8918a077a73e2ca349005efba046cee0866b34dd879c5acb
Burn
RcxGYhJtLLmZAwhA1EeMqRCVEeC2edFSYb32Qjca1or4SzKNppf1nZS3czWL27Jf741rbZfPHUMp2PHLusG7x8M

A forgery the chain accepted

REFUSED

Signed with our own key, claiming ten times the amount, citing a burn that never happened. Zcash accepted it. The rule does not: it names no real burn, so it is not a certificate and never counts.

Inscription
d54660626ac2464cdaac7009e5b0b93f8b705e6236b24455edde8a34faffc0b7